from July 22, 2018
This is a
Nederlog of Sunday,
This is a crisis
log but it is a bit different from how it was until 2013:
I have been
writing about the crisis since September
1, 2008 (in Dutch, but
since 2010 in English) and about
the enormous dangers of surveillance (by secret services and
by many rich commercial entities) since June 10, 2013, and I will
continue with it.
moment and since more than two years
problems with the company that is
supposed to take care that my site is visible 
and with my health, but I am still writing a Nederlog every day and
I shall continue.
2. Crisis Files
five crisis files
that are mostly well worth reading:
A. Selections from July 22, 2018:
1. Ecuador Will Imminently Withdraw Asylum for
Julian Assange and Hand
The items 1 - 5 are today's
selections from the 35 sites that I look at
every morning. The indented text under each link is quoted from the
link that starts the item. Unindented text is by me:
Him Over to the UK. What Comes
Europe Can Survive
the Trump Era
3. “Democratic Institutions?” – 10 Lessons from
history that will destroy
your trust in the CIA
Hersh Still Afflicting the Comfortable
5. How the
Right Wing Convinces Itself That Liberals Are Evil
Will Imminently Withdraw Asylum
for Julian Assange and Hand Him Over to the UK. What Comes Next?
This article is by
Glenn Greenwald on The Intercept. It starts as follows:
Lenin Moreno traveled to London on Friday for the ostensible
purpose of speaking at the 2018 Global
Disabilities Summit (Moreno has been using a
wheelchair since being shot in a 1998 robbery attempt). The
concealed, actual purpose of the President’s trip is to meet with
British officials to finalize an agreement under which Ecuador will
withdraw its asylum protection of Julian Assange, in place since 2012,
eject him from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, and then hand
over the WikiLeaks founder to British authorities.
I say! Incidentally, to
the best of my knowledge, Catalonia has been trying to free itself from
Spain since before the 1930ies, but that is a factual aside that
doesn't matter to Lenin Moreno (whose first name seems rather apt to
me: Lenin helped kill around 4 million Russians).
Almost three months ago,
Assange from accessing the internet, and Assange has not been able
to communicate with the outside world ever since. The primary
factor in Ecuador’s decision to silence him was Spanish anger over
Assange’s tweets about Catalonia.
Anyway, here is more:
I have no ideas about
"concessions" and also disbelieve them: The brief of it is that Moreno
wants to get rid of Assange.
A source close to the
Ecuadorian Foreign Ministry and the President’s office, unauthorized to
speak publicly, has confirmed to the Intercept that Moreno is close to
finalizing, if he has not already finalized, an agreement to hand over
Assange to the UK within the next several weeks. The withdrawal of
asylum and physical ejection of Assange could come as early as this
week. On Friday, RT reported that
Ecuador was preparing to enter into such an agreement.
The consequences of such an
agreement depend in part on the concessions Ecuador extracts in
exchange for withdrawing Assange’s asylum.
Here is some background:
The central oddity
of Assange’s case – that he has been effectively
imprisoned for eight years despite never having been charged
with, let alone convicted of, any crime – is virtually certain to be
prolonged once Ecuador hands him over to the U.K. Even under the
best-case scenario, it appears highly likely that Assange will continue
to be imprisoned by British authorities.
And that then he will be
delivered to the Americans, whose intelligence chief has a record of torturing
Here is the last bit I quote from this article:
But the Trump
administration has made clear that they have no such concerns. Quite
the contrary: last April, Trump’s then-CIA Director Mike Pompeo, now
his Secretary of State, delivered
a deranged, rambling, highly threatening broadside against
WikiLeaks. Without citing any evidence, Pompeo decreed that WikiLeaks
is “a non-state hostile intelligence service often abetted by state
actors like Russia,” and thus declared: “we have to recognize that we
can no longer allow Assange and his colleagues the latitude to
use free speech values against us.”
Yes, and Greenwald is
correct in italicizing "the
latitude to use free speech values against us": Pompeo only allows free speech he
to, and wishes to forbid and prosecute all other free speech. And
is a strongly recommended article.
Europe Can Survive the Trump Era
article is by Dirk Kurbjuweit on Spiegel International. It starts as
Politicians are used to
engaging in politics -- either with or in opposition to other
politicians. Traditionally, the foreign policy of one nation-state or
alliance is confronted by the foreign policy of another nation-state or
alliance. That's the way it has been for hundreds of years. But that's
not the way it is at the moment. When Donald Trump is involved,
politics is not confronting politics. Rather, politics is confronting
There is no precedent for
such a situation in the history of the West. That fact is also
contributing to the difficulties of practicing politics in this day and
age. Politicians, after all, frequently look to the history books for
examples to follow and traditions to pursue. But in the history of
democracies, the chapter on the bizarre is rather thin. Someone like
Trump is a totally new beast and requires a completely novel approach
That fact can no
longer be in doubt following the U.S. president's trip to
including his stopovers in Brussels,
London and Helsinki. It makes little sense to hope that Trump might
improve. He is the way he is and politicians from other countries have
to get used to it. They have to develop a specific strategy for the
period during which this president is in office.
Well... I agree
that "Someone like Trump
is a totally new beast and
requires a completely novel approach to politics" and indeed also that Trump fits very well in the
category of "bizarre".
That is, if you
degree in economy. like Kurbjuwelt. I have an M.A. in psychology and
have been saying since the beginning of 2016 that I agree with
now many tenthousands of psychologists that in fact Trump is insane,
and it is this which makes his acting, speaking and tweeting so
"bizarre", but then I have learned in the past 2 1/2 years that almost
no one ever reads, knows
or acknowledges any science or "science" than
the one he or she studied, with the possible exception of medicine
because we all may fall ill.
I take it Kurbjuwelt is
no exception, and here is his idea for what "Europe" is
supposed to do:
European Union, the appropriate strategy can be expressed in a
single word: hibernation. But that isn't quite as easy as it might
sound. We're not talking here about the long, restorative slumber of a
bear in her cave. Hibernation in the Trump era requires a complex
political concept that Brussels should pursue in lockstep with all
member states to the degree possible. Should that happen, there is
light at the end of the tunnel, and perhaps even before.
It would seem to me
that this advice amounts to: Do nothing (except the minimally
required). I do not think it will happen.
Kurbjuwelt seems to
have heard something about narcissism (but I
do not know
whether he knows that is a serious personality disorder):
Regarding narcissism: Trump
is constantly employing superlatives to praise his own deeds. Whatever
he does, says or thinks necessarily has to be the best, the greatest of
all time. On days when he is feeling modest, he might add a qualifier
like "probably." One gets the feeling that he is seeking to insulate
himself from overwhelming self-doubt. And that is what makes his
narcissism so explosive. When doubts arise about his self-proclaimed
magnificence, he is more or less capable of anything -- including
uttering sentences that many, and not just his opponents, view as
Also, this is not
cogent, for Kurbjuwelt wants his readers to believe that if "one gets a
feeling", which is almost certainly Kurbjuwelt, that (bolding added) "that is what makes his narcissism so
explosive" - which I am sorry,
but is a nonsensical
And this article ends as
This is pure baloney:
"Professional politics" is still bullshit: most
politicians in Europe
studied law, not politics or anything else, and besides
tells his readers is that either these supposedly professional
politicians have a chance to show they are needed, or else
professional politicians are the only ones who can save us. O well...
And here is the
opportunity offered by the Trump era: the rehabilitation of
professional politics. Politicians have a chance to show that they are
needed, because only they can address the challenges that face us.
Institutions?” – 10 Lessons from history
that will destroy your trust in the CIA
article is by Kit on the Off-Guardian. It starts as follows:
In the hysterical
wake of the Trump-Putin Summit in Helsinki, President Donald Trump was
roundly criticised in the media for taking the side of a “hostile
state” over his own intelligence agencies. The
Guardian referred to Mueller as a “heroic marine” who Trump
disbelieved in favour of a “Russian dictator”.
In the past, when Trump has
criticised the FBI, CIA or NSA he has been accused of “undermining faith in our institutions”.
He’s been blamed for a collapse of trust in the government. But was
this trust ever earned?
At every corner, we are urged
to simply believe what we are told. Whether it is about believing
Porton Down and MI6 about “novichok”, or believing the White Helmets
about Sarin, or believing the FBI about “collusion”, we are presented
with no facts, just assertions from authority. Those who question those
assertions are deemed “bots” at best or “traitors” at worst.
Yes, indeed - and these urges
"to simply believe what we are
told" are totalitarian
urges (but not according to the sick and rapidly turning neofascist
Wikipedia, that redefined its meaning for "totalitarianism" to
mean what former U.S. spy chief Brzezinski insisted - completely
falsely - it should mean).
Also, Kit provides an excellent
list of 10 reasons (selected from many more) that should motivate
you "to question anything
and everything the CIA – or any intelligence agency – has ever told you". Here it is:
10. OPERATION PAPERCLIP – we’ll start with an oldie
but a goody. In 1945, as the allies were advancing on Berlin from both
sides, American Army Intelligence (this was before the CIA were
founded) were “capturing” (read: recruiting) over 1600 Nazi scientists
and engineers. Most famous of them was Werhner von Braun…sorry, SS Sturmbannführer von
Whilst Allied soldiers died
in the name of defeating fascism, the CIA’s predecessors were actively
recruiting Nazis to come and build bombs for them.
9. OPERATION NORTHWOODS – The
original, and important, precedent for accusations that the CIA et al.
might engage in false-flag attacks. Operation Northwoods was a joint
CIA/Pentagon proposal designed around the idea of escalating a war with
Cuba by stoking public anger:
The proposals called for
the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other U.S. government
operatives to commit acts of terrorism against American civilians and
military targets, blaming it on the Cuban government, and using it to
justify a war against Cuba.
The idea was vetoed by
President Kennedy. Fifty years later, the CIA and Pentagon still very
much exist, but there’s no longer a Kennedy there to veto their more
psychopathic ideas. Funny how that worked out.
COUP – In 1970 Salvador Allende was elected to the Chilean
Presidency. A Physician and dedicated socialist, Allende was the first
socialist president elected in South America. The Nixon-lead government
of the United States immediately implemented “economic warfare” (as
they do, to this day, against Cuba, Venezuela and others). The economic
warfare did not work, and in 1973 Allende’s socialist party increased
their parliamentary majority.
In response, the US
“assisted” (read: instructed) the Chilean military in carrying out a
coup. Allende allegedly shot himself, and Augusto Pinochet was placed
in power as the first dictator in Chile’s history. Pinochet was a
fascist who executed Chilean “subversives” by the thousand…and was the
darling of Western leaders.
7. MOSADDEGH COUP – I could just
copy-and-paste the above paragraph and change the names for this entry.
In 1953, the Prime Minister of Iran – Mohammad Mosaddegh, a democratic
socialist – wanted to audit the income of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company
with an eye to limiting foreign control of Iran’s oil. Within a few
months, a joint US/UK operation – Operation Ajax – had removed
Mosaddegh’s elected government and turned over full control of the
state to the Shah. He was a brutal absolute monarch, but the question
of Western control of Iran’s enormous oil reserves wasn’t raised again
under his leadership.
6. OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD – A CIA
operation that you could deduce existed, even if were not proven….and
it is proven. Mockingbird was the CIA project to coerce, train, control
or plant CIA-friendly journalists in major news networks all across the
country and in every medium. It’s existence is no longer disputed,
thanks to FOIA releases of internal memos.
Mockingbird was allegedly
shut down in 1976 – just after its existence was leaked – then CIA
director George HW Bush claiming:
CIA will not enter into any paid or contractual relationship with any
full-time or part-time news correspondent accredited by any U.S. news
service, newspaper, periodical, radio or television network or station.”
If you’re willing to stake
anything on the word of a Bush, well, good luck with that. It’s a
decision that flies in the face of historical evidence.
Remember this one when you
hear about the need to trust the CIA from some pundit on CNN or MSNBC.
5. MASS SURVEILLANCE – It’s not really
talked about much these days – what with the vast majority of the media
and huge sections of the supposedly “anti-establishment” progressive
left marching in-step with the Deep State – but the NSA spied on the
whole world. The whole world. We know this to be true because an
employee of the Deep State – Edward Snowden – leaked the information.
When challenged on this
issue, representatives of the NSA and CIA lied. They lied to the
public, and they lied to congress. When they were proven to have lied, they carefully qualified their lies.
A qualified lie is still a
There is no indication they
have stopped this illegal surveillance, but they may have passed laws to make it legal.
4. NAYIRAH – A classic of “atrocity propaganda”,
Nayirah should be required reading material for anybody looking top hop
on a pro-war bandwagon. Nayirah – who originally gave only her first
name – was a fifteen year old girl who testified in front of the United States Congress.
She claimed to be a volunteer from at a Kuwaiti hospital, and to be an
eye-witness to Iraqi soldiers throwing Kuwaiti babies out of incubators
and leaving them to die:
I volunteered at the
al-Addan hospital with twelve other women who wanted to help as well. I
was the youngest volunteer. The other women were from twenty to thirty
years old. While I was there I saw the Iraqi soldiers come into the
hospital with guns. They took the babies out of the incubators, took
the incubators and left the children to die on the cold floor. It was
It was later revealed, not
only that her full name was Nayirah al-Sabah and she was the daughter
of the Kuwaiti ambassador, but that she had never volunteered at a
hospital and had seen no babies, soldiers or incubators. The whole
thing was a fiction. A fiction paid for by the “Citizens of Free
Kuwait”, an NGO (and obvious CIA front) set up to lobby the US to
intervene in the Iraq-Kuwait war.
By the time this fiction
was revealed it was too late, and the US had launched Operation Desert Storm….which was, of course, the entire
point of the exercise
Remember this, when you
hear about Assad gassing children or bombing kittens.
3. COINTELPRO – The FBI’s long running (and sometimes
illegal) COunter INTELligence PROgram, COINTELPRO was a series of
domestic projects carried out by the FBI (with cooperation from other
agencies), over decades, with the aim of “surveilling,
infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic political
organizations included anti-Vietnam protestors, civil rights groups
(including both MLK and Malcolm X), socialists, Communist Party USA,
environmental groups and feminist organizations.
The brief for these
“disruptions” came straight from J. Edgar Hoover who wanted the FBI to “expose,
disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise Neutralize” people he
perceived to be enemies of the state. The capital N in “neutralise” is
no accident, as the FBI was implicated in the deaths of several Black
Panther leaders, including Fred Hampton.
COINTELPRO didn’t just
involve undermining left-wing groups, but also creating right-wing
The FBI also financed,
armed, and controlled an extreme right-wing group of former Minutemen,
transforming it into a group called the Secret Army Organization that
targeted groups, activists, and leaders involved in the Anti-War
Movement, using both intimidation and violent acts.
Whether this was done to
actually push a right-wing agenda, create a fake threat to step up
police powers, or just sow division and chaos, is unclear. But it
Much like MKUltra (below),
COINTELPRO was “officially shut down”, not long after the public found
out it existed. However, the accidental outing of undercover policeman at a
rally in Oakland, and recent relaxation of the laws limiting the FBI’s powers,
means that COINTELPRO – or a modern successor – is very likely still a
The aim of COINTELPRO was
to “Neutralize” anti-establishment political figures – the vast
majority of targets were left wingers – through “smearing
individuals and groups using forged documents and by planting false
reports in the media”. Remember that when you see Rand Paul called
a “traitor” on twitter, or read about “Russian collusion”, or see
Jeremy Corbyn branded an anti-Semite.
Remember that it is proven
that the Deep State – our trusted intelligence agencies – pay people to
plant false stories and discredit political opponents.
2. PROJECT MKULTRA – It might sound like something
from a 70s sci-fi TV series, but it is unfortunately real. MKUltra was
a series of (illegal) experiments carried out by the CIA from 1953
until it was *cough* “officially halted” in 1973 (just after its
existence was leaked). The experiments were wide-ranging, achieved
varied levels of success, but pretty uniformly brutal and unethical.
They included, but were not limited too:
– Giving LSD to
unsuspecting soldiers to see what happened.
– Mass hypnosis and mass suggestion
– Torture studies
– Studies on the effect of verbal and/or sexual abuse
We’ll never know the full
range of studies, or how they were carried out, because in 1973 Richard
Helms, then director of the CIA, ordered all MKUltra files destroyed.
Only a fraction of them survive, thanks to FOIA requests, but it’s
reasonable to assume they destroyed the worst parts and kept the more
quote-unquote innocent files.
The CIA were not unique in
this regard either, MKUltra was their baby – but there were parallel
projects in other quarters of the deep state. Army Intelligence had Edgewood Arsenal, whilst the
Department of Defense had Project 112. All these projects were “officially
halted” in the early 70s…just around the time the public found out they
The CIA (et al.) have
strongly denied that these experiments and projects have ever been
continued in any way, shape or form…but if you’d asked them in 1969,
they would have denied they had ever taken place at all.
1. THE IRAQ WAR – This might not be
the most callous, the most dangerous, the most recent, the most secret
or the most insidious of the items on this list, nevertheless it is –
must be – number one…because it is the most brazen.
The war was started in the
name of “weapons of mass destruction” that everyone – everyone
– knew never existed. They all knew the truth, but they lied.
The President lied, the
vice-president lied, the secretary of defence lied, the secretary of
state lied. The Prime Minister lied, the defence minister lied, the
foreign minister lied. They lied to the press, the people and the UN.
The CIA, the NSA, the FBI –
then headed by the “heroic marine” Robert Mueller – they lied too. The
press repeated these lies, without question (see: Operation
Mockingbird). They weren’t “misinformed”, they weren’t “mistaken”. They
lied, they lied repeatedly – and provably – and they did it in order to
start a war, make money, take control, spread influence.
One million Iraqis died.
Our ruling class is peopled
with psychopaths and war criminals, who have so little regard for the
people they lie to they recycle the same childishly simple falsehoods
to further their evil agenda again and again and again. They tried the
same in Libya…it worked again. They tried again in Syria…luckily, it
didn’t work there.
institutions” lie to start wars. There’s no reason to think they1
aren’t doing – or wouldn’t do – the same thing about Iran, North
I copied it because I like it
and want to refer to it. Here is Kit's conclusion:
That’s our list, and
there’s really only one lesson you can take away from it:
These people, agencies and
institutions deserve no trust, have earned no trust and have abused
every micron of trust ever placed in them. To suggest we have a duty to
believe them – or that they have ever done anything to serve the public
good – is to live in a dream world.
Never trust the CIA, they have proved they don’t deserve it.
Quite so, and this is
a strongly recommended article.
Afflicting the Comfortable
is by Robert Scheer on Truthdig. It starts as follows:
Seymour Hersh has broken some of the biggest stories of the past 50
years. He won a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting on the 1968 My Lai
massacre during the Vietnam War. His book “Reporter: A Memoir” delves
into his reporting on My Lai, as well as on the Abu Ghraib prison in
Iraq and the killing of Osama bin Laden.
Hersh joins Truthdig Editor
in Chief Robert Scheer to discuss his war reportage and how opposition
to President Trump may be responsible for a resurgence in investigative
journalism among young people.
I like and admire
Scheer and I like and admire Hersh, and these are good reasons
review this article, but because the present NL is already quite long I
only quote two bits from it. This is the first, right from the
RS: Hi, this is Robert Scheer with another
edition of Scheer Intelligence, where I hasten to say the intelligence
comes from my guests. Obviously no question, Sy Hersh, you know, one
could argue you are the most significant journalist this country has
produced in certainly the last half century. I’ll say it. And I was
warned, picking up your book you say right in the beginning, you can’t
stand people who go out and report a story without doing their
homework, without reading, without reading the book. And I read the
book, several times actually. And I want to highly commend it before I
engage it. So let me just do that.
Incidentally, Hersh's book is called “Reporter: A Memoir” (and no: I do not
provide links to Amazone) and I think it is
somewhat noteworthy that Hersh currently is 81 and Scheer 82.
Here is the other bit I
quote, from quite far into the interview:
I think I can answer
question, indeed because my
grandfather was a communist who was
murdered by the Nazis; my father was a communist who survived over 3
years and 9 months in four German concentration camps; my mother
communist who was in the resistance but was never arrested (2000
communists were murdered by the Nazis); and even I was a communist, but
only till I was 20, when I rejected it and became a philosophical
anarchist, incidentally without many problems with my
RS: Why, in a free society, where OK, you can
have a kink in your career curve; you know, you can suffer somewhat;
but the fact is, we ask people all over the world to speak out against
tyranny, where they’re going to have their fingernails pulled and
genitals crushed, right? And then you ask yourself, why aren’t there
other people at the NSA who did what Snowden? Why aren’t there other
people at The New York Times
who did what Sy
Hersh did, or Ron Ridenhour? Why weren’t there more people in the
Pentagon who did what Daniel Ellsberg? That’s the big question your
I think that to really stand out (as Snowden, Hersh and
Ellsberg did, and as my parents and grandfather did, as some of the few
who really resisted the Nazis) (i) you have to be really
(both of my parents had IQs above 130, which probably is the minimum);
(ii) you have to have enough personal pride
to adopt values that
are quite impopular (which is rare); and possibly also (iii)
helps if your parents are individuals as well (as in my
If you add these three criterions, I take it you have effectively
selected something like 1 in 10,000 (which incidentally is what the
Dutch communists were in 1940, and indeed they lost 2000 of their
members in the war to the Nazis).
the Right Wing Convinces Itself
That Liberals Are Evil
This article is by
David A. Walsh on AlterNet and originally on Washngton Monthly. It
starts as follows:
If you spend any
time consuming right-wing media in America, you quickly learn the
following: Liberals are responsible for racism, slavery, and the Ku
Klux Klan. They admire Mussolini and Hitler, and modern liberalism is
little different from fascism or, even worse, communism. The mainstream
media and academia cannot be trusted because of the pervasive,
totalitarian nature of liberal culture.
I say! For this is the
completely inversed world: The extreme right-wingers in the USA
convince themselves they are right because they convinnced
that "Liberals are
responsible for racism, slavery, and the Ku Klux Klan. They admire
Mussolini and Hitler, and modern liberalism is little different from
fascism or, even worse, communism".
And I do not know whether it is correct, though it may be. Here is one
other bit from this article:
Since its very
beginning, in the 1950s, members of the modern conservative movement
have justified bad behavior by convincing themselves that the other
side is worse. One of the binding agents holding the conservative
coalition together over the course of the past half century has been an
opposition to liberalism, socialism, and global communism built on the
suspicion, sometimes made explicit, that there’s no real difference
I suppose I more or less
agree to the first paragraph (though for me the underlying
and I quote the second especially
because I think the AMA has been quite
corrupt for a long time now,
but I did not know the above bit.
In 1961, the American Medical
Association produced an LP in which an actor opened a broadside against
the proposed Medicare program by attributing to Norman Thomas, a
six-time Socialist Party candidate for president, a made-up quote that
“under the name of liberalism the American people will adopt every
fragment of the socialist program.”
B. One Extra Bit
This is an extra bit
that I sometimes use in Nederlog, although the last few years I mostly
limited myself to reviewing five articles. And in fact the following
article will almost certainly be only of interest to people
with ME/CFS and besides to some
medics, psychologists and psychiatrists.
Then again, the article is here because (i) I have ME/CFS since 40
years, as has my ex and also because both of use succeeded
in becoming (excellent) M.A.´s in psychology, although we were not able to hear any
lectures. (I take it that the reason we
succeeded were others failed is the fact that both our IQs were over
140, which at that time was at least 25 points higher than the
average IQ in the
¨Universy¨ of Amsterdam (in 1984). I am sorry if this offends you, but
it is a
Anyway... this is to notify those who are interested that the following
article is new on dxrevisionwatch:
It is technical and I
will not review it other than to say that the World Health
Organization's ICD 11 (which is quite important in
medicine) will come
into effect starting January 1, 2022, which is the year I may
become 72 if I live that long, which again is an if dictated by the
fact that my ex and I have ME/CFS since January 1979, and in 2022 will
have it a mere 44 years, in which 999 out of 1000 medical
people (in Holland) denied it was
a real disease:
My ex and myself, and 17 million other people with a similar disease,
were not ill: we were insane, although I grant that the
last 40 year this has been prettified for the naive by the non-medical bullshit term
that we were "psychosomatizers" - which really
means that (according to the medics) we were hallucinating for
40 years (while taking our excellent M.A.'s in psychology
without visiting any lectures) or else we were deceiving
medics because we did not want to work (while studying on a payback
grant that was less than what anyone else got in
I grant that in March of 2018 I read that from then on I have
chronic serious disease" (in Holland) and that I should be glad
that I merely have to wait another 40 years or so (when I will
because then new doctors will be trained, who will have more
sympathy with people like my ex and myself....
... well, I am sorry: Being a brilliant psychologist whose life has
by medical incompetence,
lies, deceptions and fraud I stay as
far away of each and any Dutch medic as I can because they have
shown themselves to be incompetent liars, deceivers and frauds for 40
Also, with the present Dutch "universities", which have been totally
destroyed as real universities between 1971
and 1995, I do not think
this will ever change as long as you can get an M.A. with sufficient
money and an IQ of 105, which is the present Blairist set-up.
 I have
end of 2015 that
xs4all.nl is systematically
ruining my site by NOT updating it within a few seconds,
as it did between 1996 and 2015, but by updating it between
two to seven days later, that is, if I am lucky.
claimed that my site was wrongly named in html: A lie.
They have claimed that my operating system was out of date: A lie.
just don't care for my site, my interests, my values or my
ideas. They have behaved now for 2 years
as if they are the
eagerly willing instruments of the US's secret services, which I
from now on suppose they are (for truth is dead in Holland).
two reasons I remain with xs4all is that my site has been
there since 1996, and I have no reasons whatsoever to suppose that any
other Dutch provider is any better (!!).